วันอังคารที่ 16 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2551

A Play In The Sandbox Is Necessary

There has been much written about Google sandbox effect, which is known. We must admit that many forum and article space during recent months. Ca I wonder why not help the majority of comments I have been seeing is negative, or at least ambivalent about the concept (if of course, which really exists, as is the case with a number of small and medium-sized Companies that do not really know). I am sure that most people are very familiar with the concept of a sandbox , but for those who are not and that the risk of annoying everyone, here is a brief summary: Google, is said, decided that the new sites listed must have their list (and public relations, etc.) while waiting for an unknown period (consensus seems to be around 90 -120 days) to ensure that the the first stick around over a period of time, and probably also continue to be classified as in principle . The concept is similar to send them off to play in the sandbox with all the other kiddies' maturity and can be tried under the same criteria as the rest. Frank, I see no problem with the idea at all. I have areas that have been in a period higher and others to be included in the sandbox , therefore I am not saying this as someone who has only created the sites you want to make it as difficult as possible for the new competition for Prepared . In recent years, I saw so many people decide (often on a whim, and once more, often with great planning) to try his luck at a business on the Internet or a otherwise, it is only to leave after a very long. Certainly not long enough to see themselves outside the sandbox (if any). I'm not sure the exact number, but Google? Approximately 8.2 billion web pages indexed, and in my opinion, there are too many sites in almost all categories in each subject. It is also true that the vast majority of them are inactive and do not contribute to the average user. Talte strictly on the basis of the home business, I am sure that nobody can possibly not agree that any idea or system, which requires a place to prove itself first as a positive contribution and to prove to be online for more than a few months, East certainly welcome. After all, someone who has had some success on the website business will tell you it takes work, time and perseverance to reach a point where there are external, while its value (with the exception a few exceptions). So why should anyone be taken seriously he would oppose a relatively short period of time testing period, when his involvement must be considered and implemented? If we really believe they will see a great advantage of Internet-based business site on the first 90 -120 days, when they really need to re-examine the reasons for doing so (despite many gurus guarantee success in much less time ...) In the case of websites on education, information and entertainment, I believe the same principle should apply. If something like sandbox has been around a lot earlier and was carried out by all small and medium enterprises, in any case, would not be so many dead links and Web sites inactive, as it is. In most cases, and in most places, there is no licensing or certification is required to start a website if anything (even under the guise of a so-called experts , Or guru ). So all in the form of a judgement or a cooling period (although the sandbox does not meet the bill in large measure) is a step in the right direction to control the number of completely unnecessary and meaningless proposed sites for a short period of time, by a whim or seeking a quick buck. Just to qualify my comments brief, I know there are a number of personal and the sites of newspapers , etc. These, of course, is a means of personal expression, and all have the right to say the world and themselves to discuss what their imagination. I do not think these types of sites in any other form of unsolicited. Obviously, these places will not be included in the vast majority of searches sense that by its very nature and as such, do not contribute to the many dead or inactive sites. In the 2005 edition of Steve Brennan popular electronic book entitled http://www.ebooks.online-plus.biz target = _blank The guide members is now available. It also has a number of partners, including wesbites http://www.hair-loss.online-plus.biz target = _blank Hair Loss Remedy and ; Http: / / Www.quit-smoking.online-plus.biz target = _blank OnlinePlus leave.

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น: